I just had to post this.
Thursday, October 13, 2011
Wednesday, October 12, 2011
Republicans Deny America Jobs
Obama's $447 billion plan to create jobs went before the Senate last night.
And it failed.
The Republicans filibustered, meaning the plan would require 60 votes to pass, and then literally every single Republican voted against the plan. If there's anything that the Republicans can unite for, it's to oppose something that would help the American worker.
Even two of the more "moderate" Democrats sided with the GOP in the vote. What a surprise. Considering the direction American politics has gone over these last twenty years, half the so-called "Democrats" currently in office are just conservatives in disguise. But while that's a problem, it's a lesser concern to what's happening right now.
The GOP is actively working against the American worker, citizens trying their best to succeed in a country that is increasingly ruled by a hyperwealthy elite. If we want any chance of continuing to live in a free country, this has to stop.
Call your congresspersons; write them letters. Tell them how disappointed you are in their behavior, and remind them that their actions determine your next vote.
And it failed.
The Republicans filibustered, meaning the plan would require 60 votes to pass, and then literally every single Republican voted against the plan. If there's anything that the Republicans can unite for, it's to oppose something that would help the American worker.
Even two of the more "moderate" Democrats sided with the GOP in the vote. What a surprise. Considering the direction American politics has gone over these last twenty years, half the so-called "Democrats" currently in office are just conservatives in disguise. But while that's a problem, it's a lesser concern to what's happening right now.
The GOP is actively working against the American worker, citizens trying their best to succeed in a country that is increasingly ruled by a hyperwealthy elite. If we want any chance of continuing to live in a free country, this has to stop.
Call your congresspersons; write them letters. Tell them how disappointed you are in their behavior, and remind them that their actions determine your next vote.
Financial Inequality and Hypocrisy
Over at Business Insider, they've got an article up with a lot of charts that are absolute must reads for any patriotic American. I've posted two of them below
These charts tell a powerful truth. While unemployment is higher, for longer, than it's ever been before, corporations are making record shattering profits. The country, as a whole, is making more money than it ever has before. We're a wealthier country than we have ever been.
But one in ten people are unemployed. If you add in the people who want to work full-time, but can only find a part-time job, then it's almost one in five. Almost one in five American citizens are either unemployed or can only find a part-time job, when they need a real one.
America is more profitable than it has ever been, but more people than ever before are losing their jobs and their homes. Where is that profit going? To the corporations, of course! Who use that money to buy more power in our government, and relax their own regulations. Which lets them steal more money from us, which lets them buy more of our government, and so on.
A few months, ago Republican politicians demanded of Obama, "Where are the jobs?" Now, as the jobless are finally starting to stand up for themselves, to blame the ones responsible for their joblessness, the Republicans have suddenly changed their mind. They yell at the protesters, "Go get a job!"
It's typical conservative behavior. If they can blame a Democrat, they'll admit there aren't any jobs. They'll say it's Obama's fault. But the instant the unemployed actually demand economic fairness, they claim there's enough jobs for everyone! The jobless are just lazy!
The GOP is the definition of two-faced. They're lying. Either there aren't enough jobs, and the protesters can't find work, or there are enough jobs, and Obama has fixed the problem. They want to have it both ways, but they can't!
Has Obama fixed the problem? No -- the House of Representatives, ridden with Tea Party idiots, has forcibly stopped his every attempt. There aren't enough jobs. And the Occupy Wall Street movement is right.
They're the patriots. Stand up with them.
Monday, October 10, 2011
Are We All in This Together?
We the people.
Those three words are the start of the most important document in our nation, the foundation for our society and our way of life, the Constitution of the United States. But it's more than that, as well. Those words are the basic symbol of American unity. These words imply that we are a people, not just 310,000,000 individuals who happen to live in the same place.
We are a people. We are a nation. When the nation succeeds, we all succeed. When it fails, we all fail.
That is patriotism. That is love of country. Anyone who disagrees with this is not only unAmerican, but anti-American. They are against the very essence of the foundation of our country.
The Republican Party has shown itself to be anti-American. No, more than that. Over the past few years, the GOP has bragged about its lack of patriotism. It's shouted its hatred of our nation from the highest rooftops it can, and all the while it's plastered American flags on every free surface. As if we're so stupid that we'd be tricked by that.
Friday, October 7, 2011
How Wall Street Hurts America
Occupy Wall Street is getting some bad press.
I mean, it's getting some really bad press. Especially from Regressive linchpin FOX News.
They're literally pointing at the the unemployed, the homeless, and the starving and saying, "The bad economy is their fault!" Well, it's not. You know who I point at? The banks, the hyperrich corporations, and the billionaires.
This is THEIR fault.
Famous reality denier Bill O'Reilly has declared that the protesters are jobless because "they don't want to work." According to Kimberly Guilfoyle, the movement is nothing but a bunch of useless people who "dirty the streets." Sean Hannity's response to the protesters is to talk over them, say they don't like freedom, and accuse them of destroying the country.
And really, these are just specific examples. Turn on the news and watch almost any coverage of Occupy Wall Street, and you hear the same thing over and over: they're dirty hippies who need to get a damned job.
Pictured: Dirty Useless People |
Well let me tell you something: if they could get a damned job, they might not be there! If the economy hadn't been wrecked by billionaires and their corporations, then maybe people wouldn't be this angry! If those hyperwealthy that FOX News and their Republican cohorts keep calling "job creators" actually created some jobs, then maybe things wouldn't have reached this point!
But the economy was wrecked by these people. These "job creators" don't want to create jobs -- they'd rather sit on their money than "waste" it on employees. And so nearly one in ten Americans can't get a job.
Regardless of the facts, conservative newspeople and pundits argue over and over that Occupy Wall Street protesters must just not want to get a job, because anyone who wants a job can get one.
Regardless of the facts, conservative newspeople and pundits argue over and over that Occupy Wall Street protesters must just not want to get a job, because anyone who wants a job can get one.
It's hard to figure out what goes on inside a Regressive mind, but it appears to be something like this: when the unemployment rate goes up, that just means America is lazier than usual. It's apparently got little to do with the economy. Because after all, even when some think the country's actually entering a depression, anyone who wanted to work could.
They're literally pointing at the the unemployed, the homeless, and the starving and saying, "The bad economy is their fault!" Well, it's not. You know who I point at? The banks, the hyperrich corporations, and the billionaires.
GOP Legislator Works to Bring Dwarf Tossing Back to Florida
Ritch Workman |
Ritch Workman, Republican legislator from Florida, has made it his goal to bring back dwarf-tossing. If he succeeds, then Floridian bars will no longer languish under draconian laws dictating what entertainment is allowed and what is not. No longer will little people have to suffer the cruel indignity of no one picking them up and drunkenly hurling them as far as possible.
After all, says State Representative Workman, "in this economy, or any economy, why would we want to prevent people from getting gainful employment?"
Fight on, you magnificent man.
Wednesday, October 5, 2011
Boycotting Koch Industries?
A lot of people have been talking about a boycott, but it's hard to get a good list of what, exactly, the corporation owns. Koch Industries is huge, and it owns a staggering number of brands. To truly boycott them, we need to stop purchasing anything made by any of the following:
- Angel Soft - toilet paper
- Brawny - paper towels
- Dixie - cups, napkins, plates
- Mardi Gras - napkins, paper towels
- Quilted Northern - toilet paper
- Soft 'n Gentle - toilet paper
- Sparkle - napkins, paper towels
- Vanity Fair - napkins
- Zee - napkins
- Insulair - cups
- Perfect Touch - cups, paper products
- Stainmaster - carpet, flooring, paint
- Spectrum - printer paper
- Lycra - spandex
- Teflon - nonstick coating
- Georgia Pacific - paper products, envelopes, etc
- DensArmor - drywall, decking products
- Flexrock
- Georgia Pacific industrial plasters (Used by many contractors and builders; you'll want to check.)
- FibreStrong - rim board
- Blue Ribbon - construction products
- Nautilus - wall sheathing
This is not an inclusive list, especially in the construction part, but I included all of the products that most people will likely run into. Most of the things left out will be identifiable by the Georgia Pacific logo.
Always check for the Georgia Pacific logo. It's the same thing as Koch. Stand up for yourself, stand up for our rights! Stand up for America.
Unfortunately, this boycott isn't enough, not by itself. Koch Industries is too entrenched in our society to simply stop supporting it entirely. After all, Koch supplies state governments across the nation with much of the materials needed for asphalt. It's hard to stop using roads. And that's not even touching the fact that Koch is primarily an energy company, and that they make most of their money by selling oil, natural gas, coal, and the electricity produced from these things.
But this does send a message. It shows both our government and the corporations taking advantage of us that we're paying attention. It's a hard, long job, but we can make them afraid of us.
Remember, though: to actually limit Koch's power, and take our country back from corporations like this, we need to change our government.
Koch Industries: Betraying America for Profit
I've had a problem with Koch Industries for quite a while.
They're the second largest privately held company in America, and they're one of the most powerful hyper-conservative forces in the world today.
They were the main reason Governor Walker fought so hard to kill public unions in Wisconsin earlier this year, and they heavily funded his campaign. They basically own Americans for Prosperity, a political advocacy group that describes itself as supporting business and opposing regulation. They basically paid for and invented the "Tea Party," financially backing groups that have trained thousands of Tea Party activists. They've donated tens of millions to groups that deny global warming, and millions more to groups that oppose clean air laws.
Koch Industries clearly doesn't care about us.
Of course, it's standard conservative politics to argue that companies should be allowed to pollute as much as they want, and screw everyone else. So what about Koch is worth singling out?
They're the second largest privately held company in America, and they're one of the most powerful hyper-conservative forces in the world today.
They were the main reason Governor Walker fought so hard to kill public unions in Wisconsin earlier this year, and they heavily funded his campaign. They basically own Americans for Prosperity, a political advocacy group that describes itself as supporting business and opposing regulation. They basically paid for and invented the "Tea Party," financially backing groups that have trained thousands of Tea Party activists. They've donated tens of millions to groups that deny global warming, and millions more to groups that oppose clean air laws.
Koch Industries clearly doesn't care about us.
Of course, it's standard conservative politics to argue that companies should be allowed to pollute as much as they want, and screw everyone else. So what about Koch is worth singling out?
Monday, October 3, 2011
"More Pepper Spray! Please!"
These protesters are parasites on our economy and country, seeking government handouts at the expense of hardworking Americans. You and your protester friends are not one of these Americans. - JonJ
welcome to New York — we are not London — cops here do not run in the opposite direction of mob thugs. - noislamists
Occupy Wallstreet and America's Nobility
Does anyone reading this think that the wealthy should have more legal rights than the poor? If so, please enlighten us on how that makes any sense at all. Because I'd have to call that the stupidest, most offensive thing I've heard in awhile.
So it kills me to say that in America, the rich have more legal rights than the poor. In this country, a rich person can have a poor person arrested for inconveniencing him. Even if that poor person is protected by the Constitution of the United States, the police show no reluctance in arresting them and hauling them off. After all, a public street is only public as long as we don't offend the businessmen nearby.
Over the last two weeks, thousands of Americans, indignant at the growing inequality between the rich and the poor, angry at the slow but steady destruction of the middle class, have gathered in New York in a protest known as Occupy Wall Street.
In their own words, "We are the 99% who will no longer tolerate the greed and corruption of the 1%."
So it kills me to say that in America, the rich have more legal rights than the poor. In this country, a rich person can have a poor person arrested for inconveniencing him. Even if that poor person is protected by the Constitution of the United States, the police show no reluctance in arresting them and hauling them off. After all, a public street is only public as long as we don't offend the businessmen nearby.
Over the last two weeks, thousands of Americans, indignant at the growing inequality between the rich and the poor, angry at the slow but steady destruction of the middle class, have gathered in New York in a protest known as Occupy Wall Street.
In their own words, "We are the 99% who will no longer tolerate the greed and corruption of the 1%."
Sunday, September 25, 2011
Herman Cain: Pizza Guy for President?
Ex CEO of Godfather's Pizza Herman Cain |
First, let's talk about his political experience. Well, there is none. That was easy. He's never held any political office. He's absurdly proud of this, going so far as to claim it's a good thing:
Knowing how Washington works isn't necessarily an advantage. As a businessman going in, I don’t want to know how Washington works. I want to change Washington D.C. and so by not knowing how it is supposed to work I can ask tough questions that will help change the culture.That's wonderful. He doesn't want to know how Washington works. Cain apparently thinks that being President of the United States is like being in a comedy movie, where pluck and audacity is enough to succeed at pretty much any task in the world. Maybe he imagines that he's like Reese Witherspoon in Legally Blonde 2, and that his ignorance of political culture will be just what's needed to shock all those stuffy old codgers out of their ruts and get something done for a change! He's definitely shown that he doesn't have the slightest idea how government works, with bizarre statements about how he'll only sign bills that are three pages or shorter. I guess he just doesn't like to read.
Thursday, September 22, 2011
Did Georgia Kill an Innocent Man?
Short answer: Probably.
Slightly longer answer: Probably, but there's no way to know for sure, since they killed him.
Troy Davis was charged with killing a police officer in 1989. There was no physical evidence of the murder, only witness testimony and circumstantial evidence. Since then, out of nine eyewitnesses, seven of them have recanted. They signed affidavits changing their testimony. Witnesses stated publically that they had been pressured by the police to implicate Davis. But the prosecution argued that the affidavits were not admissable in court, and that the statements of the other witnesses were not relevant. The court ignored the fact that witnesses implicated someone else as well.
Another man confessed to the murder. Three witnesses signed affidavits stating that he confessed to them. But this man was not subpoenaed, so the evidence was dismissed.
They executed him last night. With no direct evidence of guilt. With the majority witness testimony that was used as proof recanted by the witnesses themselves. With the witnesses stating that they had been pressured to implicate him. With another man having confessed.
Anyone who doesn't think that any of these developments is enough to cast some doubt on the case is an idiot or they're just blood-thirsty. Any one of these things casts doubt, and all of them together casts a whole lot of it.
And he wasn't even given another trial.
Monday, September 19, 2011
Class Warfare
Anyone who pays even the slightest attention to the media knows that the GOP loves to accuse liberals of something they call "class warfare." By the Republican definition, it seems that anything that doesn't benefit the rich is a form of class warfare. Raising taxes on the wealthy, lowering taxes on the middle class, increasing social benefits for the poor, it's all somehow class warfare. A liberal can't order coffee in the morning without a gaggle of Repubicans shouting, "Class warfare! Class warfare!"
It's ridiculous. It's also dishonest.
Sunday, September 18, 2011
Bigotry is Bad for Business
Chris Hughes, Co-founder of Facebook |
But there are other reasons, too. Chris Huges, one of the founders of Facebook and a native of North Carolina, explains too the Wall Street Journal that discrimination like this is more than just morally reprehensible, it's bad for business, as well.
Hughes . . . who is engaged to social activist Sean Eldridge, says the move will chase entrepreneurs like himself out of the region and hobble job-creation efforts at a time when state unemployment is above 10%.He's even said that he'll donate $10 for every person who "Likes" the Facebook page of Equality NC, a non-profit organization that is dedicated to equal rights. (Up to $10,000.) Good for you, Chris.
Lots of people talk about conservatives as if they just have different priorities. Republicans are said to care about business so much because they think that happy, unregulated and un-taxed businesses are the only thing that can pull us out of our economic slump. And sure, 90% of the time, a Republican lawmaker will go out of his way to give a corporation anything it wants, regardless of the individual citizens that he hurts along the way.
But then you see something like this. It's pretty clear that when it comes down to the line, Republicans are more concerned with controlling our lives than they are helping businesses. Or maybe they just don't want any new businesses. After all, their campaign trails are paid for by the old businesses, who feel like they'd do better without the competition from any fresh new business.
Maybe it's more fair to say that they "making things better" isn't really something Republicans care about at all.
Thursday, September 15, 2011
North Carolina's Amendment One
Throughout the nation, conservatives are working hard taking away our rights as American citizens. In many cases, it's not enough for them to simply deny a person's liberty. The average Republican respects strength, brutality, and clear statements of superiority. What could be more brutal than stomping down on the face of someone you've already defeated? Conservatives are never happy with merely winning a fight, they need to grind their opponents into the dirt, laughing at their own barbarism. Anything to feed their sense of superiority.
North Carolina remembers that it's supposed to be bigoted |
Friends, there's something you need to understand. North Carolina already has laws against the freedom of marriage. Can two men get married in North Carolina? Can two women? No. That's illegal, and has never been allowed. So why an amendment to the state constitution?
That's the stomping I mentioned earlier, the grinding into the dirt. It's not enough that gay marriage is illegal, they want it to be unconstitutional, enshrined into the very basis of the law.
Regressives have been fighting to amend the state's constitution for years, but every time the legislation was put forward, the House and Senate stopped it. That changed this year, as Republicans took control of both chambers for the first time in over one hundred years.
Tuesday, September 13, 2011
The pro-death Republican party
Don't let anyone ever tell you that the Republicans are "pro-life." My friends, that is a bald-faced lie. The GOP is many things -- pro-business, pro-intrusive government, anti-science, and anti-liberty -- but pro-life is not one of them.
Republicans do tend to be pro-embryo. I'll give them that. They'd rather a woman die in child-birth than to have an abortion, and they'd execute a woman for having a miscarriage, if she can't prove her innocence. But pro-life? Not at all. Republicans love death.
Did anyone catch the GOP debate last night? At one point, Wolf Blitzer asked Ron Paul what should be done with a 30 year old without insurance, but who needed hospitalization to live. Ron wouldn't come out and say it, but his answer did imply that he should be left to die. But as horrible as that is, that's not what scares me the most.
Blitzer followed up by asking point blank, ""Are you saying society should just let him die?"
And the crowd cheered, "Yeah!"
These people don't care about life. They don't care about people at all. The candidates themselves might be too timid to come out and say it, but their supporters aren't. They like death. I won't claim to know why. Maybe it makes them feel powerful, to know that others are dying while they continue to live. Maybe they get a visceral thrill from imagining anyone they disagree with dying, unaided.
After all, this is the same group of people who cheered at Rick Perry's record breaking 234 executions. It was the biggest applause of the night, and for what? For Rick Perry's callous disregard of human life. For his driving desire to kill a man, even when the evidence shows that the prisoner is innocent. When a government committee gathered evidence disputing the conviction, Perry fired them, rather than have the new evidence considered.
One Republican voter commented about the charge, "It takes balls to execute an innocent man."
You read that right. The execution of an innocent man might have actually helped Rick Perry's campaign.
Friends, I'm not entirely against the death penalty. The sad fact of the matter is that there are some people out there that just don't have any business being alive anymore. If a person disrespects the lives of others to that degree, then maybe we don't need to respect his, either. The problem is that there's no court in the country that's 100% perfect, all the time. People make mistakes, even when they're judges, even when they're jurors. And until someone's killed, there's always a possibility that person will turn out to actually be innocent.
Now look at how Rick Perry does things. He suppressed evidence that could have freed an innocent man. And why? Because he'd rather kill that innocent man than let him go. There's no word for that other than bloodthirsty. And it was that bloodthirstiness, that blatant disregard for an American citizen's life, that got Perry a cheering applause at that GOP debate.
So what have we got here? We've got two viable Republican candidates: Rick Perry, whose supporters applaud the reckless execution of innocent citizens, and Ron Paul whose supporters call out for the lingering death of anyone without insurance.
Don't ever let the Republican party tell you they're pro-life. They're nowhere close.
Republicans do tend to be pro-embryo. I'll give them that. They'd rather a woman die in child-birth than to have an abortion, and they'd execute a woman for having a miscarriage, if she can't prove her innocence. But pro-life? Not at all. Republicans love death.
Republican Congressman Ron Paul |
Blitzer followed up by asking point blank, ""Are you saying society should just let him die?"
And the crowd cheered, "Yeah!"
These people don't care about life. They don't care about people at all. The candidates themselves might be too timid to come out and say it, but their supporters aren't. They like death. I won't claim to know why. Maybe it makes them feel powerful, to know that others are dying while they continue to live. Maybe they get a visceral thrill from imagining anyone they disagree with dying, unaided.
Republican Governor Rick Perry |
One Republican voter commented about the charge, "It takes balls to execute an innocent man."
You read that right. The execution of an innocent man might have actually helped Rick Perry's campaign.
Friends, I'm not entirely against the death penalty. The sad fact of the matter is that there are some people out there that just don't have any business being alive anymore. If a person disrespects the lives of others to that degree, then maybe we don't need to respect his, either. The problem is that there's no court in the country that's 100% perfect, all the time. People make mistakes, even when they're judges, even when they're jurors. And until someone's killed, there's always a possibility that person will turn out to actually be innocent.
Now look at how Rick Perry does things. He suppressed evidence that could have freed an innocent man. And why? Because he'd rather kill that innocent man than let him go. There's no word for that other than bloodthirsty. And it was that bloodthirstiness, that blatant disregard for an American citizen's life, that got Perry a cheering applause at that GOP debate.
So what have we got here? We've got two viable Republican candidates: Rick Perry, whose supporters applaud the reckless execution of innocent citizens, and Ron Paul whose supporters call out for the lingering death of anyone without insurance.
Don't ever let the Republican party tell you they're pro-life. They're nowhere close.
Saturday, September 10, 2011
The Poll Tax is Back
What do you think of when you think of America? Do you think of pie? Sports? Or do you think of something more important, more visceral, more righteous? Do you think of freedom?
I do.
One of the most important freedoms we have is the freedom to vote. Unfettered access to the polls is one of the most vital freedoms that an American citizen can have. Voting is the foundation of our liberty, for through voting, our government is made answerable to us. If we cannot freely vote, then we cannot take part in the most fundamental activities that make our country "free." Let me give a brief history lesson.
In the past, states have passed laws that required voters to pay for the privilege to vote. These laws were largely considered "Jim Crow" laws, enacted largely to keep the black population from having equal legal footing. Through these poll taxes, states could say, "Everyone has the equal right to vote, it costs the same for everyone." But while most whites could easily afford the tax, African Americans were significantly poorer, and had a much harder time doing so. The poll taxes effectively barred a large population of blacks from being allowed to vote in their own governmental elections.
That's right. States passed laws disallowing their own citizens from voting. They took away the most basic freedom possible. They were citizens, but without the ability to vote, how could they stand against their own government? How could they make their voices heard?
Fortunately, the Supreme Court disallowed this practice entirely in 1966.
And yet today, right now, as you are reading this, states like Wisconsin, Indiana, Texas, and more are enforcing laws nearly identical to those ruled unconstitutional nearly fifty years ago. The Republican Governor of Wisconsin, Scott Walker, has signed legislation requiring a citizen present a photo ID before they will be allowed to vote.
"What's so wrong with that?" you might ask. Surely it's important to verify a voter's identity before letting them vote. Indeed, that's the rationalization that the Republicans have given. Time and time again, they have insisted that voter fraud is a huge problem, and must be dealt with! They've been crying "voter fraud!" since 2008, when it became possible that Obama might actually win the presidency. But there is no problem with individual voter fraud. Indiana has not been able to cite a single instance of voter fraud in its entire history. Kansas has had more UFO sitings than it has had allegations of voter fraud. No, my friends. These laws have nothing to do with stopping nonexistent fraud. They have everything to do with keeping undesirables from having a say in the government.
And we have to remember, government IDs cost money. Money that for many people may be inconsequential. What's thirty dollars? But not everyone has that money, and those most likely to not have an ID (the poor and the elderly) have had no reason to obtain one. After all, if they didn't drive, they didn't need one. Until now.
Now, these states do have to comply with the letter of the law. They can't require money in exchange for the ability to vote. If a citizen asks for a free voter ID, they have to be given one.
But a recently surfaced internal memo from the Republicans shows that DMV employees were specifically instructed to not tell citizens that voter IDs could be had for free.
So by law, they are required to let people vote without paying a tax. But they've built a situation where people are told that they need to pay. The only way to be able to vote without paying a government fee is to specifically ask if you can vote for free.
It's obvious that the poor are being targeted by these laws. After all, the poor have the most to lose if these Republican regimes stay in power. Governor Walker and his counterparts in other states are afraid of the poor vote, and so they're stomping down on it as hard as they can.
If we needed any more proof of this blatant discrimination, then pay attention to this: after passing the voter ID law, Governor Walker began shutting down DMV offices in primarily Democratic areas. At the same time, he began expanding the hours of DMVs in Republican-heavy areas. In many of the poorer areas of the state, DMVs are now open only one or two days a week, and only for a couple hours a day.
This isn't just Wisconsin, folks. Similar laws have been passed in Texas, Indiana, Kansas, Georgia, South Carolina, and Tennessee. All Republican controlled, all with reason to fear the disenfranchised.
Jim Crow laws are back, but this time they're targeting anyone that the Republicans think might stand against them.
I do.
The most important freedom of all. |
One of the most important freedoms we have is the freedom to vote. Unfettered access to the polls is one of the most vital freedoms that an American citizen can have. Voting is the foundation of our liberty, for through voting, our government is made answerable to us. If we cannot freely vote, then we cannot take part in the most fundamental activities that make our country "free." Let me give a brief history lesson.
In the past, states have passed laws that required voters to pay for the privilege to vote. These laws were largely considered "Jim Crow" laws, enacted largely to keep the black population from having equal legal footing. Through these poll taxes, states could say, "Everyone has the equal right to vote, it costs the same for everyone." But while most whites could easily afford the tax, African Americans were significantly poorer, and had a much harder time doing so. The poll taxes effectively barred a large population of blacks from being allowed to vote in their own governmental elections.
That's right. States passed laws disallowing their own citizens from voting. They took away the most basic freedom possible. They were citizens, but without the ability to vote, how could they stand against their own government? How could they make their voices heard?
Fortunately, the Supreme Court disallowed this practice entirely in 1966.
And yet today, right now, as you are reading this, states like Wisconsin, Indiana, Texas, and more are enforcing laws nearly identical to those ruled unconstitutional nearly fifty years ago. The Republican Governor of Wisconsin, Scott Walker, has signed legislation requiring a citizen present a photo ID before they will be allowed to vote.
Republican Governor Scott Walker |
And we have to remember, government IDs cost money. Money that for many people may be inconsequential. What's thirty dollars? But not everyone has that money, and those most likely to not have an ID (the poor and the elderly) have had no reason to obtain one. After all, if they didn't drive, they didn't need one. Until now.
Now, these states do have to comply with the letter of the law. They can't require money in exchange for the ability to vote. If a citizen asks for a free voter ID, they have to be given one.
But a recently surfaced internal memo from the Republicans shows that DMV employees were specifically instructed to not tell citizens that voter IDs could be had for free.
So by law, they are required to let people vote without paying a tax. But they've built a situation where people are told that they need to pay. The only way to be able to vote without paying a government fee is to specifically ask if you can vote for free.
It's obvious that the poor are being targeted by these laws. After all, the poor have the most to lose if these Republican regimes stay in power. Governor Walker and his counterparts in other states are afraid of the poor vote, and so they're stomping down on it as hard as they can.
If we needed any more proof of this blatant discrimination, then pay attention to this: after passing the voter ID law, Governor Walker began shutting down DMV offices in primarily Democratic areas. At the same time, he began expanding the hours of DMVs in Republican-heavy areas. In many of the poorer areas of the state, DMVs are now open only one or two days a week, and only for a couple hours a day.
This isn't just Wisconsin, folks. Similar laws have been passed in Texas, Indiana, Kansas, Georgia, South Carolina, and Tennessee. All Republican controlled, all with reason to fear the disenfranchised.
Jim Crow laws are back, but this time they're targeting anyone that the Republicans think might stand against them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
These are the people that oppose us. What's sad is that there's a good possibility that these are middle class Americans. The nobility has them so cowed and broken that they'll cheer innocent people being maced. They kneel at the feet of the rich simply because they're rich. "He has more money than me, so he must be worth more." Remember, these are the kind of Ayn Rand worshippers believe that the poor should be allowed to starve to death.
We can find these people everywhere. Stand around a few minutes next to any newsstand and you'll hear someone complaining about how "Obama's stealing our money" or something. Because that healthcare bill, the one that keeps people from dying? That's just one step too far. They're usually too embarrassed about their opinions to voice them in public.
On the internet, you'll see what they're really like.
Regressives like this are our enemies. They are traitors to the American public, and are doing their best to sell us out to their corporate lords.
Be better than that.